this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
476 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would the US not be happy about this? It takes us closer to our 2%, and guarding the Arctic is easily the most natural role for Canada to fill.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Could be argued that the US administration is more interested in making military equipment sales than bolstering NATO.

I figure you're right though. All our allies should be happy when Canada pulls it's own weight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not aware of the US selling their subs to anyone. They had a partial tech-sharing program with the UK a while back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

US military sales are not limited to subs. Doubtless they want to sell more planes and everything else. You can look up graphs of US arms exports, it's a lot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And they are helping the Aussies develop nuclear-powered subs, notably with UK reactors, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Although the US/Aus deal scuppered a Aus/France deal for subs IIRC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The Chinese would have landed in Sydney by the time the French laid the keels for the subs in the deal they struck with Australia.