Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
I do like socks, but I'm no puppet. I'm interested in discussion about this article because it looks legitimate, which is horrifying. If you're able to disprove the claims, that would be a relief.
How about this? "WPATH removed lower age limits in SOC8 while consulting with child castration fetishists"
This is the sort of useful conversation I was looking to have. I think we're in agreement. In another comment, I wrote this:
Which might not be how you would phrase it, but largely agrees with: