this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
279 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

see, I'm genuinely OK with paid DLC, given the following:

  1. the game ships feature complete
  2. the DLC adds to the scope of the game
  3. the prices of the DLC are reasonable
  4. the older DLC prices drop and drop,

A great example of this is DLC in Cities Skylines, where adding DLC which adds colleges, parks, or industrial districts, which are fun and nice to have, but not nessecary. Additionally, CS often went on deep sale, with a huge portion of the past DLC being only a couple bucks.

That said, No paid DLC > paid DLC

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think C:S is a good example, as Paradox has released lots of repetitive, content-lacking DLC that are just the same district-drawing mechanic recycled over and over again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Fair enough, but it still doesn't annoy me the way that Sims DLC is

load more comments (1 replies)