this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2276 readers
30 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I should clarify that my statement is my own speculation.
The study didn't directly measure pfas in food. They measure pfas levels in blood plasma and breast milk of pregnant women and self reported diets. So I assume that takeout containers is a substantial contributing factor.
But the article mentions that the researchers also suspect contaminated filters for coffe and contaminated irrigation water for rice. So there might be reason to be concerned about other sources of contamination.
The eggs association is a little more puzzling to me. I want to also blame that on fast food sandwhich wrappers, but that might be too much of a leap.
It sounds a lot like you're just baselessly speculating, do you have any sources to confirm that any of these things actually contribute to pfas?
Fortunately, lemmy isn’t a peer-reviewed journal, so speculation is perfectly acceptable.
I speculate that teflon pans might have contributed to the egg thing.
Do you want studies that show take out containers contaminate food with pfas or do you want studies that show that those are sufficient to explain the levels recorded in this study. I could provide the first but not the latter.
Why sound indignant when I literally clarified that I was speculating?