Chaotic Good

531 readers

1 users here now

A place to post examples of chaotic good actions.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

I don't support this but I don't not support this (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's nice to see Lemmy will be continuing Reddit's tradition of believing booby traps are ok because anyone trying to touching your precious things deserves the be physically hurt, regardless of the countless ways it can hurt other people who were doing nothing wrong.

This example isn't even defendable from a home defense angle because you left the thing out on the damn boat, not locked away. At that point it's not just a booby trap, it's a baited trap.

And for fucks sake it's a damn cooler, who cares this much about it but leave it where anyone can get it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Especially people in the US seem to have a weird violence boner. It's (unfortunately) perfectly normal that some people like violence, but over there, a concerning percentage of people think that every minor transgression justifies violence.

Look at the comments below those typical "fuck around and find out" videos. A guy snatches a hat as a bad joke and gets beaten up. That's not okay, that's assault, but the comments celebrate it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Snatching a hat is also assault.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No. That's theft at most.

In any case, equating taking a hat and physical violence is just absolutely bonkers. Every psychologist would diagnose that as an anger management disorder.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/assault

Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. No physical injury is required, but the actor must have intended to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the victim and the victim must have thereby been put in immediate apprehension of such a contact.

“Intention” in the context of assault, means that the act is not accidental, but motive is immaterial.

It does not matter if the goal of the tortfeasor (assaulter) was merely to scare the victim or if the act was meant as a joke.

The tortfeasor need not have intended for the contact to be harmful or offensive, only to have intended the actual contact.

lol it's a psychological disorder joke bro, it was defensive contact when I grabbed your giant hat off your fucking giant head, can't you take a joke bro, you got anger issues bro