Science Memes

11047 readers

3055 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

139

Garfield (mander.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I don't get it. What is the progression in this supposed to be?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

My interpretation is that Jon starts talking about how division by 0 is not possible. Garfield then goes on about how we can use limits to assign values to such expressions, which we can use to calculate derivatives. I guess Garfield starts to question whether dy/dx really exists after all this.

Jon then changes the subject to be about integrals, which Garfield is immediately annoyed about the missing +C.

It’s super funny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is the +C "new"? I have a B.Sc majoring in mathematics. Now I graduated over 30 years ago and I never used much that I leaned in my degree during my career - so I couldn't differentiate or integrate to save my life today. But, the equations at least look familiar. The +C does not.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Definitely not new. However, in many practical applications you can sorta kinda ignore it (but definitely not all!).

load more comments (1 replies)