this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2465 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The guy might be a nutjob but I don't think he's talking about getting them back through war, Argentina has next to no military.

Having colonies in the year 2023 is ridiculous though, I don't know why so many comments act like Britain is in the right here in any way whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you think the Falklands should be part of Argentina, logically Hawaii should be part of Kiribati. Alaska should be Russian/Canadian, etc etc. If you think about it for more than a minute it becomes clear that geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

geographical location is not the only factor or even the most important one

I'm pretty sure that if another country took over Hawaii, or the Catalina Islands off the coast of California, especially just for being able to put a marker down on future oil reserves, that the US would not be ok with that claim.

Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute .

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Even if your bullshit wasn't bullshit, theres another huge difference you are ignoring - the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the US is capable of doing something about it, Argentina is not.

Well, they did try, and failed, but it was costly for both sides, so it wasn't a hard one-sided affair.

Besides, that's not the point I'm trying to make, and not relevant to this discussion. The point of legal ownership by "first rights", and not "might makes right", is what I'm speaking towards.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool, so since Britain has held the islands longer than Argentina has existed you consider the matter settled?

No. Think Argentina has the strongest claim based on previous ownership from Spain, and being the nearest nation to the islands.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But the first settlement there was french, so you're wrong.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

But the first settlement there was french, so you’re wrong.

They left though, and then Spain was there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Since when were the Falklands an example of colonialism? Nobody lived there until the Europeans showed up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because the people of the Falklands literally voted to stay with the UK?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[insert obama awarding obama meme here]

I mean the UK won't return Gilbraltar to Spain who were in the EU with them they won't obviously return the falklands.

I'd like to see the UK also defending the "vote of the people" if Ireland voted to leave the UK

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

return the falklands.

To who, the French?! They're the only ones who settled there before the British (beating them by a whopping 1 year), and they left again two years after they showed up. (And I say "settled there," by the way, because if we went by who discovered it then the only people the British could return it to would be themselves.)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

To who, the French?!

They claim ownership via Spain's ownership, when Argentina won their independence from Spain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because the population of the Falklands (that we installed there) want to remain part of Britain for whatever stupid reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No one else was there. Why would they want to be part of anything else?