this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZedong

4242 readers
14 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
0
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

man-made famine

more neutral wording would have been just 'famine'. there was nothing deliberate about it and the famine killed not just Ukrainians but Russians too.

and 'holodomor' itself is a term which makes people think its like holocaust. 'Communism as bad or worse than Nazism' is historical revisionism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's man-made because the severity of the famine was undeniably affected by policy. I don't think there's anything biased about that. What it means, and the extent to which it was deliberate, if at all, should be expanded upon in the article proper.

The usage of "Holodomor" is so common that it's perfectly reasonable for an encyclopedia to use it. It's the article title most people are going to be looking for, after all. But it's worth noting that the very first section (etymology) has a paragraph about how Holodomor is different from the Holocaust due to no evidence of intentional extermination.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

wikipedia could have Holodomor redirect to Soviet Famine but they don't.

Holodomor is different from the Holocaust due to no evidence of intentional extermination.

why call it man-made then? sure you can argue that man-made doesn't mean 'deliberate' but thats not how most people would interpret it. 'famine' is the clear neutral term.

where is mention of 'man-made' in Bengal Famine?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943

Bengal's economy had been predominantly agrarian, with between half and three-quarters of the rural poor subsisting in a "semi-starved condition". Stagnant agricultural productivity and a stable land base were unable to cope with a rapidly increasing population, resulting in both long-term decline in per capita availability of rice and growing numbers of the land-poor and landless labourers. A high proportion laboured beneath a chronic and spiralling cycle of debt that ended in debt bondage and the loss of their landholdings due to land grabbing.

where is the criticism is British policy?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

why call it man-made then? sure you can argue that man-made doesn't mean 'deliberate' but thats not how most people would interpret it. 'famine' is the clear neutral term.

If you only read the first paragraph and ignore the rest of the article you deserve to not understand anything.

where is mention of 'man-made' in Bengal Famine?

Feel free to add it. I'll support the change

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you only read the first paragraph and ignore the rest of the article you deserve to not understand anything.

misleading people is good, got it.

Feel free to add it. I'll support the change

First, the page is protected, also good luck getting that past mayo ass mods.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's misleading. Distinguishing between famines caused solely by external factors, and famines caused in part or in whole by policy, seems entirely reasonable. I was responding to your assertion that someone might misunderstand the meaning of "man-made".

The biases of Wikipedia reflect the biases of its editors (there are Wikipedia articles about that). It could be a great tool for radicalization, but I suppose it's easier to just complain about it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

There is no such thing as a famine "caused solely by external factors". The wording is misleading because it implies there is such a thing as a famine that isn't man made and therefore the one that occurred in the Soviet Union being called "man-made" is already a deliberate attempt at drawing a distinction between it another famines. It is a fact that in all famines there is a human factor necessary to compound on environmental factors in order to cause a famine. You don't get famines that occur due to nature alone. The problem with this article is that by starting out with such language the myth is reinforced that there was something exceptionally malicious about this famine.