Greentext

4390 readers

940 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

748

Anon thinks about CPUs (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (17 children)

I'm a little offended that this utterly skips over software, as if a CPU would do anything without the component that was invented before any CPU.

Software without a CPU is still useful. The reverse is not true.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

my guy megabytes of executable binary are just about as usable as a cpu try reverse engeneering more 1s and 0s than you've ever read into something usable when you dont even know how it converts into assembly and logical operations because you lack the architecture knowledge of a cpu

load more comments (16 replies)