this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3142 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full articles:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That last one makes me suspicious of the whole post now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I know I am a meme lord but this isn't one (in a colloquial sense). I saw one of the big journalism mills for science put these out and liked it and wanted to boost this space.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Check the linked article, the issue is around how information that is technically true but presented in certain ways can influence people. They found that headlines that, for instance, said someone had died after being vaccinated had a significant effect on people's intention to get vaccinated themselves, despite complications being very rare.

Basically people are easy to influence, and you don't need to outright lie to do it, just presenting facts in an unbalanced way will do it. Many would call that lieing too, but it's by omission rather than by fabrication.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I think it's a tongue in cheek comment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, if it's factually accurate it's factually accurate. That should come first. Although I understand how framing factual data impacts its understanding.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Like how 100% of people who come into contact with dihydrogen monoxide perish.