this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Selfhosted

39980 readers
524 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
0
File Browser vs Nextcloud (lemm.ee)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey all! I'm still in the somewhat early stages of setting up my home server. I have Nextcloud installed for file storage/management. However, realizing that it would be nice to have access to the entire storage drive for the server, I installed File Browser.

Now I'm having a hard time justifying having both. I have a handful of services that could be run as individual services (calDav, notes, news, etc... although, phonetrack seems to be hard to replace).

I've noticed lists that people have posted of the "must-have" services on their home servers have included both. My question is "why?" It seems like, at a basic level, they serve similar roles. If you remove the app-platform role from Nextcloud by separately hosting the individual apps, what benefit do you get from having both Nextcloud and File Browser?

I really like NextCloud, but i'm having a hard time justifying the resource usage if its functionality can be replaced by a handful of containers. Or, is that the reason to have it, so you don't have to do that?

Any opinions on the subject would be appreciated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Syncthing is not a good solution at all. It requires a persistent connection. That means you will have crazy battery drain and you will have issues when your mobile devices roam between networks. Syncthing is not a replacement for Google Drive/Nextcloud, it solves a different problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Personally, for mobile, I access my files with SFTP pointed to the same folders I sync my desktops with Syncthing.

Also, what stops you from having syncthing without a persistent connection? You can set it to just sync whenever the phone is plugged in and/or you manually open the thing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

SFTP is not the same as Drive functionality, that's the thing. Again, Syncthing solves a different problem, it's not applicable here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

SFTP is not the same as Drive functionality

If you're a good client it is.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, show me a good SFTP client which auto-uploads the photos I take on Android an iOS devices, let's me share them with anyone I wish and creates a photo library with tags, date grouping, etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

$18 per year? No thanks. But a good find.