Technology

58144 readers

4427 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

883

Google won’t comment on a potentially massive leak of its search algorithm documentation (www.theverge.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A purported leak of 2,500 pages of internal documentation from Google sheds light on how Search, the most powerful arbiter of the internet, operates.

The leaked documents touch on topics like what kind of data Google collects and uses, which sites Google elevates for sensitive topics like elections, how Google handles small websites, and more. Some information in the documents appears to be in conflict with public statements by Google representatives, according to Fishkin and King.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (14 children)

It's honestly quite strange that this sort of black box system is allowed to exist. How are governments around the world OK with a vast majority of the internet being filtered through a private company's lens without any sort of insight into how it works? That sounds skeevy as shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Better than those governments having control. Ideal scenario is everything is decentralized

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree decentralized is better, but isn't that an argument in favor of a government having more control than a corporation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No? What I said was "better than governments have control" how is that pro government?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

you said "ideal scenario is everything is decentralized"

would it be right to assume "more decentralization is better"?

if so, then which is more decentralized: a corporation or a government

yes, what you said was paradoxical, which is why i was saying "it's actually in favor of government"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Ahh, I suppose I could see that

load more comments (11 replies)