this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

Games

16403 readers
1809 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This kinda feels like Sony forced this to happen. I have no supporting evidence, it just feels like it to me.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You'd be right on the money imo.

I've been a AAA developer for almost 2 decades, and there is no way in hell they did not explicitly sign to have the sony account linking. I didn't like the way he acted on twitter acting like the poor indy dev getting wrecked by the tyrant, when he was hoping it would fly.

He thought it would be okay to sell your data for his chance at making a game. When it backfired due to popularity, he didn't take any responsibility and let sony look bad. I bet there's a lot of people at Sony who didn't like that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree, he made his bigger partner look bad. Even if sony didn't force this (which I'd be surprised about), their own board probably did. "Oh you just pissed off our biggest partner, that doesn't seem great for business"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Arrowhead is a very small company. Company details are actually public knowledge in Sweden, and you can see that arrowhead only has 4 board members, two of them being the CEO and vice CEO: https://www.allabolag.se/5567796544/befattningar

Crunchbase seems to think they don't have any venture capital, so it's possible that the board members are the only shareholders here, but who knows.