this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1185 readers
409 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/15863526

Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While true, it also wasn't really what my post was responding to. Thanks though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The thread is discussing why it's considered abuse if you can't point to a victim. The answer turned out to be "because the law says so."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you read the law you posted, it doesn't actually address the question of victimhood. Also, I don't really get why you're still trying to force an unrelated point into this part of the discussion. Maybe find another place in the thread where someone thinks it's legal and go talk to them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you don't think you sound like you're saying it's legal/should be legal I have very bad news for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Seeing that it's been explicitly stated that that's not the case, you strike me as a dude that cares less about the meaning of words than the opportunity to argue about them.