this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Astronomy
4011 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm glad the article mentions that in this case, it really doesn't matter; like, there seems to be nothing to 'pollute' on Mars (also 7 tonnes is not much at all). Bit of a strange headline to me.
if it gets contaminated with earth life the it'll be harder to detect martian life...
I suppose so, but I believe they always make sure not a single trace of Earth life is left on the equipement they sent to Mars, for obvious reasons. So they already control for that.
Besides looking pretty messy, I'm not sure this does any harm.
nasa sure puts a lot of effort into it... can't say i feel confident about other countries that crash into it...
on top of that, nasa has recently found that they've been breeding bacteria that lives off of their disinfectant, and so no they don't already control for that.
Mars is inhabited by robots, but the Moon is inhabited by tardigrades because China crashed a lander.
this one?
Wrong country and wrong outcome, I really nailed it. Given how hardy they are, I can't say I'm convinced they're all dead. Not that they'd actually be active without air and water