this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1174 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

and they are not even close to the same on other issues (LGBTQ rights, unions, women's rights, taxes for the rich, etc.).

Yes they are

If "supports genocide" is the single issue for you, then you live an immensely privileged life

Square peg argument in a round hole of reality. Literally just copy and pasting into a thought terminating cliche what was absurd and ghoulish when you used it for healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Who is president now and what has happened with those issues?

"prove it" How about about you go look up what a null hypothesis is, brain warrior?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

You sure you know what null hypothesis is? Its entire point is that the newcoming claim has to prove itself not the established one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The fact that you think any of that is Biden's fault tells me all I need to know about how serious you are about politics and facts.

I'm just going to link you to this comment, because your "objection" is exactly the same as theirs.

https://reddthat.com/comment/9976883

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

smuglord I'm sorry you just activated my "I shut down emotionally and intellectually if I hear the wrong take" card

I'm assuming it's your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Ah, I just looked at you're from hexbear. No wonder you're trying to get trump supported.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm assuming it's your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

Libs never think they have to back up their claims and assertions no matter how flimsy. The burden of proof is always on anyone whose opinion doesn't match their propaganda. Then they tell us we're in an echo chamber michael-laugh

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

If you genuinely think

and they are not even close to the same on other issues (LGBTQ rights, unions, women's rights, taxes for the rich, etc.).

Is a flimsy statement then yes, you are in an echo chamber.