this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
1079 points (94.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9379 readers
1579 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (6 children)

People should be allowed to own land and own homes with yards

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, sure, people also have the right to fly private jet, but that doesn't mean it is a "good" decision.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

sure, and people should also be guaranteed a right to housing, now which one do you prioritize?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Just implement a Japanese solution

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

And everyone else should be free from subsidising it 1

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They should equally be allowed to own homes without yards. But exclusionary zoning, minimum setback, and maximum lot coverage laws don't allow that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. People love to treat it as "a war on cars/lawns/etc.", but it's really a war on everybody who doesn't want to be legally mandated to have those. All we're asking for is to end the legal mandates (zoning, parking minimums, setback requirements, etc.) and for those who wish to partake in those wasteful luxuries to pay their true price without public subsidy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Meanwhile rural areas exists what effect would turning a necessity for them into a luxury?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

There's plenty of land that isn't in a city. Go get it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

If that's what you want, the place for that is the country side. But for those of us who want to live with amenities, this shit has got to stop.