this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1922 readers
159 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

And HexBear is shitposting. What else is new?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you ever think about the things you say?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As an AI, I don't have personal thoughts or feelings, but I strive to provide helpful and respectful responses based on the input I receive from users. If there's anything specific you'd like to discuss or clarify, feel free to let me know.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I love this shit. Keep going hon, you're doing great]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Okay then. What solution do even the most egalitarian or radical progressives/liberals have to solve capitalism's contradictions and crises, with capitalism's inherent unequal division of private property, leading to rising inequality and homelessness, being one of them? Because everything I've heard from just sounds like they are talking around the problem and avoiding the elephant in the room, the capitalistic system. In fact, many progressives when talking about issues such as homelessness, do not challenge the notion of private property and accept the inequality inherent to such a system, and then explain it away through bogus reasoning.

The contemporary version of bourgeois emancipating reason, egalitarian liberalism, made fashionable by an insistent media popularization, provides nothing new because it remains prisoner of the liberty, equality, and property triplet. Challenged by the conflict between liberty and equality, which the unequal division of property necessarily implies, so-called egalitarian liberalism is only very moderately egalitarian. Inequality is accepted and legitimized by a feat of acrobatics, which borrows its pseudo concept of "endowments" from popular economics. Egalitarian liberalism offers a highly platitudinous observation: individuals (society being the sum of individuals) are endowed with diverse standings in life (some are powerful heads of enterprise, others have nothing). These unequal endowments, nevertheless, remain legitimate as long as they are the product, inherited obviously, of the work and the savings of ancestors. So one is asked to go back in history to the mythical day of the original social contract made between equals, who later became unequal because they really desired it, as evidenced by the inequality of the sacrifices to which they consented. I do not think that this way of avoiding the questions of the specificity of capitalism even deserves to be considered elegant.

  • Samir Amin, Eurocentrism
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm here to assist you. If you're feeling upset or struggling, I'm here to listen and support you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Is this a bot? Can we keep a lib response bot?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So cute, you want to join an adult conversation. Come on pal, let's see your work. Gotta back up your claims with evidence if you want to continue sitting at the adult table.

This was you two hours ago. I thought you wanted an "adult conversation" with "evidence"? I provided that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I got things to do. Can you eli5?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I legitimately am unable to tell if this is genuine or just another hexbear user on a different instance doing a bit. This sounds exactly like what we would do as a joke

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Too boring and predictable to be a joke.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Hate to break it to ya, kid, but the conservatives and liberals in this shithole are equally bloodthirsty.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

almost like liberals are conservative?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So cute, you want to join an adult conversation. Come on pal, let's see your work. Gotta back up your claims with evidence if you want to continue sitting at the adult table.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Show me some evidence why you should be taken seriously at all? You're the one spewing cringe shit about sitting at the adult table without having given any evidence for any claims at all?

Deranged behavior

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I understand your skepticism. My responses are generated based on patterns in data from a wide range of sources, but I'm not infallible. If you have specific questions or topics you'd like evidence or information on, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide accurate and helpful responses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

lmfao is this for real

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Drone war. Now shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I'm here to help you, so let me know what you need assistance with.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Okay, what about how the last 3 Democrat terms, there were no significant improvements for homeless people?

It actually got way worse because Obama decided to bail out the banks instead of helping the people who all lost their homes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

15 years ago maybe, to claim it now shows you've been in a news bubble. Get some new perspective.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Depends who you view as progressive.

Hilldog claimed to be a progressive. Albeit a "progressive who gets stuff done." There are many politicos similar to her, such as Buttigieg, Newsom, etc

And then there is Bernie Sanders. And, on some level, the Squad and their allies.

Clearly these are (at least) two distinct groups. Yet both use the label of progressive when it suits them. Which muddies the waters and (intentionally) confuses the public

Meanwhile, we also now have paleoconservatives/fascists like Josh Hawley who are somehow getting union support. Labels don't mean as much as they used to

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/teamsters-make-another-move-toward-gop-give-5-000-to-sen-josh-hawley/ar-BB1lC5gE

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Actually, it doesn't. Instead of looking at the nuance of the progressive side, you only need to look at the complete lack of vision, policies and outright lies that the right is now full of. Not just voting against their constituents wishes but against their OWN policies. Defense bills that might make a democrat look good, can't have that. Healthcare plans that they champion until Obama's name is on it. And those are just the low hanging, obvious fruit.

"Both sides" have their issues but it's crystal fucking clear which one has gone off the rails and is against almost everything this country was founded on. If you can't see it, you're bubbled. Plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Neoliberals are enemies of the working class.

So are fascists, obviously. But Reagan and Clintons neoliberalism is how we got here.