this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1765 readers
22 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because there is no intelligence in it.

Yeah, thanks for saying this. Current AI has literally 0 intelligence whatsoever. It’s basically just pattern matching. People are getting all hyped up about these chatbots, when they are literally just pattern matching, glorified autocompletes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, thanks for saying this

For repeating the common uninformed narrative about what people think AI is vs what it actually is? Yeah thanks for perpetuating big tech's lies that will get open source initiatives regulated by the government while corps will run unrestricted with your data, good job.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The most common misunderstanding is that people think gpt and such are intelligent. Wich is objectively complete BS. If you think otherwise (which it seems like) you should consider either shutting up or informing yourself correctly.

Yeah thanks for perpetuating big tech's lies that will get open source initiatives regulated by the government while corps will run unrestricted with your data, good job.

I have also no idea where this BS came from. You live in china or something?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

LLMs are objectively AI. They are by definition artificial intelligence. It is irrelevant whether or not you ascribe intelligence to them, they are artificial intelligence. If you have no idea that you're literally parroting, that's on you. No idea what china has to do with anything

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A degree in software engineering with a minor in artificial intelligence and a decade of professional development experience.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In other words you have a monetary interest in marketing your algorithms as intelligent...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No? I don't work for an AI company just because I studied that in school. Do you have a reading comprehension issue? You literally parrot big tech's arguments for the restriction of open source AI development and then don't trust someone who literally has experience and training with the topic, fuckin lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Go sell your snakeoil somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's literally FOSS but ok lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

FOSS snakeoil doesn't mean it is working the way its advertised... But as i said. Sell your snakeoil somewhere else. Even if you "don't get money for it"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If an LLM is "Intelligence", then I'm guessing so is, say, a mechanical cash register?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Not even remotely comparable

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, its the same type of algorithm that gives you personalized ads, just with different content.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

This is so hilariously incorrect