this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Palestine

920 readers
7 users here now

A community for everything related to Palestine and the occupation currently underway by the occupying force known as Israel.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. Existence is resistance for Palestinians.

Please refer to Israel as Occupied Palestine, or occupied territories. The IDF is a fascist and ethnonationalist occupying force. Israelis are settlers. We understand however that the imperial narrative (which tries to legitimise Israel) is internalised in the imperial core and slip-ups are naturally expected.

We always take the sides of Palestine and Palestinians and are unapologetic about it. Israel is an occupying power whose "defence force"'s (note the contradiction) sole purpose for existing is to push Palestinians out so they can resettle their rightful land. If you have anything positive to say about Israel we do not care.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On October 14, Israeli President Isaac Herzog made a statement that has ignited intense debate and controversy. His words, “There are no innocent civilians in Gaza,” have raised serious concerns about their implications and potential genocidal intent. In this article, we will delve into the context, legal definitions, and the broader impact of such statements. https://medium.com/@chrisjeffrieshomelessromantic/israeli-president-isaac-herzog-said-there-are-no-innocent-civilians-in-gaza-47e4ed0899ea

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

MBFC profile for The Conversation

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.

Overall, we rate The Conversation Least Biased based on covering both the right-center and left-center politically, as well as covering evidence-based topics. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. In fact, The Conversation is an IFCN fact-checker.

Detailed Reporting

  • Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
  • Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
  • Country: Australia
  • MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
  • Media Type: Website
  • Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
  • MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 2010, The Conversation is an independent, not-for-profit media outlet. Academics, edited by professional journalists author articles, and freely available online and for republication through a creative commons license. The Australian website launched in March 2011, and has expanded into editions in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2013, United States (U.S.) in 2014, Africa in 2015, France in 2015, Canada in 2017, Indonesia in 2017, Spain in 2018 and Europe and Brazil in the 2020s.

In 2016, The Conversation’s FactCheck unit became the first fact-checking team in Australia and one of only two worldwide accredited by the International Fact-Checking Network, an alliance of fact-checkers hosted at the Poynter Institute in the U.S.

Read our profile on the Australian government and media.

Funded by / Ownership

The Conversation websites are held by the not-for-profit educational charity owned by The Conversation Trust. The Conversation is funded by the university and research sector, government, and business.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Conversation is covered by a charter of editorial independence. The authors must be academics or researchers. Authors have final sign-off on their articles and complete statements that disclose potential conflicts.

The articles reviewed on the US Conversation website demonstrate the use of minimally loaded language such as this: Why the US has higher drug prices than other countries. Like most on The Conversation, this article is thoroughly sourced from credible educational and media outlets such as Commonwealth Fund, New York Times, HHS.gov, and Kaiser Health News.

In general, The Conversation covers a wide range of topics, most of which are evidence-based. Opinions expressed come from both the slightly left and slightly right, with more coming from a more liberal perspective.

#Failed Fact Check None in the Last 5 years. In fact, they are an IFCN fact checker in Australia. Overall, we rate The Conversation Least Biased based on covering both the right-center and left-center politically, as well as covering evidence-based topics. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. In fact, The Conversation is an IFCN fact-checker. (7/10/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 02/23/2024)

Source: https://theconversation.com/us