this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8250 readers
538 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why? All those features already exist as separate companies. Discord for chat, Nexus for workshop, like 5000 places run their own marketplace etc.

How would it be better for everyone if you have to set up 5 separate things? That's currently the issue with Epic's launcher that it does nothing other than let you buy games so it doesn't provide the value Steam does.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because then they would plug and play with whatever service you use

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you can already do that with Discord with the in-game overlay and anyone else is free to implement stuff like that too. If you mean that there should be a open source alternative for the Steam client then you can check out Lutris, it can be used to launch steam games.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

More evidence that there is no reason for steam to have these features

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What evidence? If you prefer alternatives, then those are available

It's clear why people prefer Steam: it has good features. But the other launchers should complete by making better features not forcing Steam to remove features.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Other services exist to achieve those things so it’s not necessary for them to do it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not necessary, no but it adds value to it's users and thus making their platform the most popular.

Like Epic's launcher is the perfect comparison for this: It has the bare minimum features available to sell games and people hate it for it's lack of features. It's not necessary for Epic to add those features but clearly people value those in their choice of platform.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Which they shouldn’t have the option of

It’s like saying Amazon and Walmart are better than a local shop because they offer more/are cheaper

They shouldn’t be allowed to compete at that size