Australia

3520 readers

112 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Trial finds cashless gaming makes little difference to gambling behaviour on pokies (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In short: One of the first cashless gaming trials in NSW found the technology made little difference to the behaviour of gamblers.

The Wests New Lambton trial has received criticism from gambling reform advocates, who say it did not include a card with binding and default limits.

What's next?: The Independent Panel on Gaming Reform will provide findings from an expanded statewide cashless gaming trial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

So it's a bit cooked but basically humans do stuff that's harmful, governments supplying it at least removes profit incentives.

You can't ban gambling out of existence but a government body can be set up in such a way that odds are fairer, only less addicting games are offered (e.g. no pokies because flashing lights and sounds are satanic), the rooms have natural light and clocks etc. Any money made goes into gambling assistance programs or community improvement or whatever.

Would people still get hurt? yes. Would there be corruption? yes. But there's no way it can be worse than private operations which still have all the same problems with less transparency and being harder to regulate, plus the profit incentive.

Think of it like injecting rooms, trust me it's way safer and less glamorous to shoot up /get supplies at one of those than a house party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

@naevaTheRat @Neato

Germany actually has a similar approach with the gambling agency.

It actually tries to set rules that protect gamblers (no loans, no advertising, no parallel games, regulated user accounts) and limits the kinds of games available.

https://www.gluecksspiel-behoerde.de/de/praeventionspielerschutz/massnahmenkatalog

Proceeds from gambling don't have to be non-profit, though. So gambling is still lucrative for casinos with a license. Or the states with their state run lottery.

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GKL_Gemeinsame_Klassenlotterie_der_L%C3%A4nder

#gambling #germany #addiction

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. That sounds like a better plan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

In the US most of the lotteries are run by the government (typically state governments). If they can do it we can too.