this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
232 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39004 readers
3175 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Russia's army has grown bigger despite sustaining losses when it invaded Ukraine, says a US general.
  • US Army Gen. Christopher Cavoli said the Russian army "is actually now larger — by 15 percent."
  • "Russia is on track to command the largest military on the continent," Cavoli said.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This isn't at all surprising, in fact a lot of people were trying to point out at the outset that the longer the war dragged on, the larger and more sustained Russia's military would grow.

Ukraine simply doesn't have the population to keep up indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Also have to consider loss of experience, equipment and morale/exhaustion, along with economic costs on the civilian population.

May be larger, but are they professional forces that are well trained and equipped (for russia) or warm bodies and second tier equipment? What about the losses of experienced non-coms and officers?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

That's how they always do it though and it didn't stop them in the past (to be fair, from invasion though which is a lot different)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At what point does a military cease being fatigued and start being 'battle hardened'?

I think the most the West expected was to drain Russia of their military capabilities, but they've overshot that goal and now Russia has doubled-down on their military production. Absent NATO getting more directly involved, I don't see how this trend is good news for Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

When improved performance exceeded losses due to fatigue. Also have to consider if support structures are delivering what the front line needs.

I would argue Russia military capabilities are being drained in every way except manpower.