this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
134 points (83.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
116 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    flatpak remote-add flathub-verified --subset=verified https://dl.flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo
    
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I've had nothing but good experiences with Flatpaks/Flathub and bad experiences with AUR/nixpkgs.

    Fedora also has it's own Flatpak repo now with it's own runtime.

    [โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

    Same. Ubuntu AND Fedora Libreoffice, SciDAVis and more where broken, not the Flatpaks.

    Flatpak is really meant for the big GUI apps. No problem with small distro packages really. It just takes off the huge burdens of maintaining distro packages for like Libreoffice, which is as big as the Linux Kernel.