this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
373 points (93.3% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2453 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app's founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What's next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app's founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle's photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app's full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You are arguing that communities can't exist unless they unite against a foe?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No my argument is some people all they have in them is "fight against a foe". It means if you don't present yourself as a foe they'll walk right past you, it's like a trex. It'll only chase something that moves, so because they are always in fighting even with no opponent they will make one within themselves because those are the only people looking for a fight.

Like they have 0 interaction with people who aren't interested in a fight. Take note that some random accused me of being far righter hoping I would take their bait. It's pathetic at best. It's truly an example of the snake eating its own tail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

T-Rex damnit. Hyphens are important

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

His community can't and if he was capable of imagining other people's lives, he wouldn't be far-right in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Growing up means recognizing someone can understand someone without empathizing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Their name checks out though.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Ozymandias moment