this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Memes

4025 readers
23 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell me sincerely, because I want to get into the mind of someone like you, do you really believe that wikipedia is a trustworthy source on literally anything? Like deep down, when you go fetch a wikipedia link, do you really think "yeah I'll just link wikipedia then I won't have to make a point myself"?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wikipedia is trustworthy enough for famous historical events, you won't find write in it that the gulags weren't real

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It is in fact precisely such highly political historical topics that wikipedia is most untrustworthy about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

all of these sources come from western analysts during the cold war, all of whom belonged to western think tanks designed to propagate misinformation against communism.

Your sources are inflated by people long dead and their relatives pump this same shit for you to consume. Gulags existed, so does labor camps in america, america also regularly massacred students and workers. And caused a silent famine to happen in the midwest, yet you scream communism to drown out any forms of alternative information you feel uncomfortable about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What makes it trustworthy on historical events?