this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
29 points (89.2% liked)
Asklemmy
43906 readers
1114 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No as both are lossy codecs you will always lose quality doing so. You can do it with ffmpeg.
You may want to tweak parameters for bitrate, etc. But this is not needed at all, as AAC had patents that are now expired.
If you get .flac, .wav or similar lossless music, you should encode that with opus. But lossy to lossy makes nearly no sense (apart from specific players not supporting them)
Fixed.
Unless you have a strong stance against people storing lossless files of their music? But I don't think that's quite what you meant :)
it's my music and i dont like proprietary formats