this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
290 points (97.7% liked)

Privacy

32424 readers
135 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is something to always take into consideration and not forget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I would put Mullvad and IVPN up there as the two VPNs I'd trust most to do things right, but I still agree with everything you've said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I'd put cryptostorm up there too

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

After the changes to their TOS I lost any trust I had in Proton

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

See the last points in the article: run by activists, and would rather shut down than cooperate with law enforcement.

I don't know if proton is run by activists, but I do know they've cooperated with law enforcement by inserting code to log user requests when coming from a specific user. Plenty of articles about the court case, and it's also why they did away with their no-log policy.

Also, are their logins token based or username based and connected to the protonmail account?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think they only did the login thing with their mail service and email was never a protocol ment for privacy and email and vpn laws vary wildly. Feel free to correct me tho .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sure here's the correction, and why I'd never trust them with anything sensitive.

They had a no-log policy, and all mail is PGP encrypted on their servers and proton to proton is encrypted in transit and at rest (it doesn't travel), decrypted only client-side in the browser or with proton bridge, with your account password acting as the PGP key password.

They could have designed the system so they couldn't be forced to add that backdoor, or at least automatically notified all users when an unauthorized change was detected, or they could have shutdown, or they could have revoked their warrant canary, but instead they were caught when the court case came to light and they were caught with their pants down, and revoked their no-log policy. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/09/privacy-focused-protonmail-provided-a-users-ip-address-to-authorities/

This weekend, news broke that security/privacy-focused anonymous email service ProtonMail turned over a French climate activist's IP address and browser fingerprint to Swiss authorities. This move seemingly ran counter to the well-known service's policies, which as recently as last week stated that "by default, we do not keep any IP logs which can be linked to your anonymous email account."

That's why I asked if the proton VPN is token-based and completely disconnected from the proton email account, or if they're the same login. If the latter, it's trivial to request the IP address of email account [email protected]