this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
47 points (88.5% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2900 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

Indeed none. That's literally what the report said. After reviewing 50 hours of video footage and 5000 photos not a single instance of sexual evidence was observed. Patten said she was there to emotionally validate people not collect evidence. Israel has blocked the UN team that has that mandate. Because there is zero evidence and israel knows it.

Here's an actual breakdown of the report.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Jfc some people are dense. What is more likely, that sexual violence occurred as it has in literally every previous attack like this in human history. Or that Hamas acted like puritans while committing terrorism?

Edit: there’s like one good point in your article (“Patten’s report functions as a distraction from genocide”), the rest is BS about not believing victims

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

We're not talking about speculation.

We're talking about evidence.

Funny how you shared a link that wasn't actually evidence, and now you pivot to speculation while calling others "dense".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Eyewitness evidence is not evidence? Do you know how many convictions don’t involve forensic evidence?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)