Europe

8484 readers

1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Bulgaria: Chinese rail maker CRRC withdraws from public tender after EU launched probe into it over suspected state subsidies (www.barrons.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Brussels had announced the probe on February 16, with EU internal market commissioner Thierry Breton at the time saying CRRC Qingdao Sifang Locomotive was thought to have relied on subsidies to "submit an unduly advantageous offer" to try to win the tender for electric trains in Bulgaria.

EU internal market commissioner Thierry Breton said that Europe's single market remained open "for firms that are truly competitive and play fair" but that Brussels will take "all necessary measures to preserve Europe's economic security and competitiveness".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The EU just looked into the potential for dumping. They were not finished with the process and therefore did not punish CRRC at all.

Also China is not that poor. GDP per capita is only a third less then that of Romania.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

The EU just looked into the potential for dumping. They were not finished with the process and therefore did not punish CRRC at all.

What's your point here? There are actual quotes in the article claiming the pull-out as a result of the regulation, meaning they didn't pull out because they wanted to.

Also China is not that poor. GDP per capita is only a third less then that of Romania.

But both are "up-and-coming" as I said alongside "poor" so I'm not sure why you're arguing semantics here. China is one of very few exceptions when it comes to actively losing money to richer countries (Net Resource Transfers). This regulation is not about China, it targets any foreign company, and if you understood my post, you'd know that the vast majority of them are being drained and in need of economic help.