this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1673 readers
22 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The thing is the human brain is very small and very efficient and has some limits on what it is made from being biological in nature.

As the human brain exists we know it is possible to make. So if we make something as equally as functional then whatever we make we just make a new version 10 times as big.

The problem is making that first artifical brain, but when we make that I don't see how we couldn't have an explosion in intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Human brain is not very efficient. It just barely made efficient enough to start civilization - it did not have time to evolve within civilization to become more intelligent. Think about how more intelligent we would be if we were to continue evolving in the same direction of smart civilization builders for another million years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How exactly are we supposed to replicate the human brain, when we barely understand it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We wasn't able to understand fire and we replicated that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Moreover, just because we don't completely understand it now doesn't mean we never will.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Which is why neural network computer science needs psychologists and sociologists to regulate it.

It's only a matter of time before corps start trying to simulate human brains, but even the smaller models deserve at least the same level of consideration that we give to animals.