this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
776 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9809 readers
2 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t mind being able to give up my car and truck. But since I’m out in rural parts. It wouldn’t workout too well when it came to other needs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I lived in rural places without a car. This is an American problem because of policy not because you are rural.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I have trailers I use haul firewood and such. I burn about 3 quarts a year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have trailers I use haul firewood and such. I burn about 3 quarts a year.

If that's for heating, ideally you'd be using a heat pump / reverse cycle AC as wood burning heaters are harmful to health due to PM2.5 particles and bad for the environment due to emissions. But I get that there is a bit of an upfront cost that may be dissuading you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I have a cat similar to vehicle that super heats up. I barely produce any smoke or anything. It’s a device inside a wood Burning stove that doubles its temperature to burn anything left from the smoke.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cord of wood for anyone interested or just hasn't visualized how much for wood a cord is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Eh, wasn't too far off estimating that at 4 Raummeter: A cord is 3.62m^2^, close enough. In both cases you measure the total volume, including gaps, with quite some leeway in size of the pieces but they gotta be stacked or you get much less wood.

Common when buying firewood because it's delivered like that and space on the truck is ultimately more expensive than the gaps in the wood and caloric value differs, anyway, whereas wood for construction or furniture use is sold by solid square metre. Either measured or calculated from weight+humidity+some wood-specific constant. Lots of eyeballing in those measures but it all averages out in the end, you loose some you get some.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Normal people outside of America in rural places live in communities that can arrange for firewood delivery. The only reason you need your own truck is because you don't have any semblance of infrastructure, community or mutual aid. This is a policy choice and a failure of your culture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Well thank you! So if everyone relied on the same service for firewood. It be like Amazon where it’ll take 3 days minimum to get it. Plus I pay next to nothing. My land has trees. I cut them down, and then replant new quarter grown trees. Not everything is delivery like some are thinking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've lived in a rural area and my neighbors were always happy to lend me something if I needed it. If I needed a truck to haul wood I could just borrow one, or even get it delivered.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So if I didn’t have a truck and you don’t have a truck. Nobody 20 miles around you doesn’t have a truck. What you do now? What you’re saying is you rely on others. Thats nice and all, but at some point you need to do stuff “Yourself”.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not the person you replied too, but US is so large, I can imagine there's situations where policy can't support those sorts of things. Not mention the fact that people who live in rural areas are more likely to have a culture of not wanting to interact with others and doing things on their own. Regardless, many of the policy changes to reduce car usage are really aimed at reducing car usage in dense areas rather than outright bans or the like. If these policies continue to work out in the US, the relatively few people living in rural areas with vehicles wouldn't be problematic (in terms of causing traffic nor causing injuries/deaths)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The US is in no way exceptional or different than anywhere else.

Only in America is "doing things on their own" involve running a global empire to ensure their supply of oil. Without the federal government subsidizing rural people in America it would be physically impossible for them to live there, this is literally the opposite of being independent they are extremely dependent on massive globalized infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone wants the US to run a global empire and coincidentally, the people were talking about are more likely to want the US interfering less with their lives and outside the country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Then they better get used to not having trucks.