this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
24 points (81.6% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3206 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/13315139

CATL, the little-known Chinese battery maker that has the US worried

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The developing of "new things" is pretty international and not exclusive to any region. Universities around the world have been working on energy storage for decades, and lithium batteries are absolutely no different. US universities, European, Chinese, it doesn't matter. They're all hard at work in this area.

What you do see more of is marketing from Chinese companies of cells that make extremely bold claims and never make it into US or EU products for some reason. IMO that reason is the fact that these "cutting edge" cells are known to use chemistries and technologies that have not at all been proven even in lab settings. Solid state cells is one glaring example of claiming victory long before any reliable demonstration of overcoming massive hurdles has been demonstrated, but there are plenty others.

There's also the huge question mark outstanding right now where CATL has claimed cell prices will be cut to less than half their current costs over the next year. It's not at all likely that this is possible without a huge injection of cash from the government propping up the industry and driving costs lower intentionally. Which is a trade violation for WTO members. Whether it's right or wrong is another question, but it's against the trade treaty we all signed onto.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which is a trade violation for WTO members.

Curious to hear more about this. Are you saying subsidized products cannot be sold on the international market? Wouldn’t creative accounting solve this, e.g., buy saying that the subsidized portion is only available domestically, which reduces demand globally, thus lowering prices?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Any nation receiving the products would obviously see through that and protest to wto

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay, but how is it a trade violation?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Because of the rules established by wto members. They decided it was a violation, they all agreed to the terms, so it's a violation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The "marketing from companies that make extremely bold claims" is also pretty universal. It is not exclusive to any region.