this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZedong

4289 readers
13 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But that seems to be a different point to the one you made at first. Making it seem as though Russia is at war so that Putin can build a palace doesn't seem accurate.

That was not in any way the point I made. I merely called out Putin's squandering of public funds (for his own personal interest) to contrast against western squandering of public funds.

Russia is not at war to glorify Putin.

It's in Putin's political benefit:

Although, his estimation does seem to be rising in the eyes of the global south

As you have described.

Again, the point you replied to seemed to be talking about indebting Dutch and Danish taxpayers to pay for a war they're not part of. Russia is at war, so it would make sense that Russians will be taxed

Russia is only at war because Russia started a war. A war that the Russian people had no say - hell, they had no idea - in starting.

But in response to your reply: in general, Russians have very little choice because Russia was forced into a corner by NATO.

This is a false narrative. Russia did not have to start a war. There is no excuse here.

I'm not sure what you mean by outdated equipment. Outdated by whose standards?

Outdated by Russian standards. I think anyone would consider WW2 weapons and expired rations to be outdated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those outdated weapons can sure turn state-of-the-art NATO weapons into scrap metal. (See pic above).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

redditors when they have to realize that the mighty ubermensch superior german engineering tanks get blown up by an atgm like literally every other tank

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I always forget history started in February 2022