this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4091 readers
9 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Doctors used to regularly treat patients with mercury and blood letting. Then more data came out to say it was bad so they stopped doing it. That's how medicine works.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We still do bloodletting. Some hospitals have medical leeches. You do not know what you’re talking about,

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But they don't do it for everything because things they did use it for they found out were bad, just like puberty blockers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was a dumb comparison and as others have pointed out, giving people mercury was not evidence-based treatment. Comparing half a century of data using quality methods and testing to mercury chugging centuries ago is profoundly ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

The evidence is not there for puberty blockers and it isn't there for mercury.

Either way the medical professionals have worked out what is best for the patient based on all the information and they have decided no to puberty blockers. No point talking about it anymore, the experts have spoken and neither of us has more data than them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Those weren't evidence based treatments to begin with. When we got evidence we stopped using them.

Puberty blockers already have evidence. They've been used since the 80s.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

no, it wasn't "more data", it was just data. blood letting and mercury are pre-scientific treatments that were in use during the 1600s. puberty blockers were developed with a modern understanding of hormones, and extensively tested before they saw use in a clinical setting. you might as well have brought up magic as a legitimate medical practice that we eventually proved wrong. like, no duh, but it also has basically no bearing on the safety of a chemically synthesized hormone inhibitor invented in the 20th century.