this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
553 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

48208 readers
720 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 112 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There are a bunch of free channels on the internet that some TVs can just stream without a dedicated app. These channels are supported by ads like cable/whatever channels, but not locked behind a subscription. VLC is supporting whatever formats they use to allow (or make it easier; IDK) people to watch them if they want.

The other part is that they're working on web assembly to allow sites to use VLC as their embedded video player.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Arent HTML5 players there for that?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

you don't even need a player script; browsers today can play media on their own.

and scripts with added features is a very crowded market.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I’m so conflicted about web assembly. I’m a web developer and I think it’s going to be amazing eventually but 20% of me thinks it’s going to be a security nightmare and require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Can web elements be sandboxed in any meaningful way?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm mostly worried about how much less open this will make the web for simple local hacking. I often add small features to webapps I use by injecting code and hooking into their systems (when it's not an app with open source, where I send a PR instead - and if I can work around issues I do contact the owners with a working fix).

This will be much harder with WebAssembly. Sure, there'll be decompilers in time - but in the time it takes me to change a small piece of behaviour in such cases, I can add multiple features in the current JS environment, even if the code is obfuscated.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm more concerned that the web will get even slower and bloated. We are already seeing the first frameworks that ship a webassembly .NET runtime, Python runtime, JVM, ... . I kinda fear that in 10 years when you visit a site you need to download runtime xyz in version abc for the 1000th time. All because some people or companies just can not be bothered to learn any new technology.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

That's quicker than people, heck I'm going on my 3rd decade and still not at my potential. Or so I like to tell myself.