this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
169 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32456 readers
557 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Librewolf i got 16.48 bits of information, on TOR browser 10.32 bits, but on Tails I managed to get only 9.3 bits.

https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/

(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

What would be considered a high score on this? Is 16 too high?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if it ran the test again, I'd say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn't mean anything

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 183,996 tested in the past 45 days.

:(

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you have canvas randomisation turned on (firefox) you'll always be unique but also not traceable between sessions.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Yup, canvas is heavily weighted in this test based on the results.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 183,614 tested in the past 45 days.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 17.49 bits of identifying information."

Chat am I cooked?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Same result here. I'm using Gnome-web, which is already pretty niche, so that probably really lowers my score.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Huh mullvad browser got me the lowest overall. 10.44 bits and a non-unique fingerprint.

Compared against:

  • Firefox with arkenfox user.js (macOS)
  • Tor (macOS and android)
  • Vanadium (android)
  • Cromite (android)
  • Mull (different than mullvad) (android)

I do a vast majority of my browsing on my phone, unfortunately. Vanadium scored the best (on mobile), but it not having extensions (dark reader is a must) and the navigation bar not being movable to the bottom of the screen keeps me on Mull.

I don't love using mullvad for day to day browsing as I can't whitelist specific cookies to retain. Don't love having to re 2fa daily.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Despite having strong protection according to these results, I always get unique fingerprinting from them. Which is scary.

Edit: Now I tried Tor on my desktop and got:

Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 628.7 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours. Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 9.3 bits of identifying information.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How does tails get the bits so low?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

12.67 from Safari/iPhone, without changing any settings. This is my most commonly used browser

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 91389.5 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 16.48 bits of identifying information

Doesn't look good. How do you make it so that your browser doesn't have a fingerprint at all?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

You can't not have a finger print. You can a best try and look like everyone elses.Sadly the free market won't care and as such you won't blend with normal users. Still you can try and look like ever one else in the privacy community

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It seems like the characteristics of my Android tablet doom me here - I was unique even using Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I misread the title as "Cover your taxes" and got really excited to earn about tax avoidance tips. Legal ones obviously.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

With browser settings that actually let me use the internet in a way that's not overly cumbersome and annoying, I get 16bits or something and a "nearly unique fingerprint"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Block any and all ads, then it doesn't matter that they have your data if they can't make money off of it (they still will do that by creating data aggregates but you can't control that)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

After disabling extension "I still don't care about cookies" on Librewolf, I went from 17.48 bits unique fingerprint to 16.48 nearly unique one.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m unique :) this ain’t great

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (7 children)

its ok if your fingerprint changes on every browser startup

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›