this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
598 points (95.4% liked)

People Twitter

5380 readers
378 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

three is the first number that starts to cause problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

A bit random no?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And 52 is divisible by 13.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

If it bothers your OCD, think of it more as (7x3)+(10x3)=17x3=51

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is how I have always calculated in my head. It used to drive my mom and my teachers crazy when they asked me to verbalize my calculations. It was like I was hurting them somehow. I never understood why.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dude/ Dudette that's worse. 7x3=21, 10x3=30, 21+30=~~492~~ 51

That does less insane to the membrane

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I see them as the same except that your way illustrates what his parentheses are doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think it helps to remember that 3 times 7 is 21. When I think about that it looks less wrong.

It's the stupid seven multiplication table. Whatever glitch in human software makes it look so much less intuitive than all the others messes with so many other things that should be easy. I swear I struggle every time I have to look at it. I had to double check seven times three multiple times right now.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't think that actually helps, because it's all vibes. 51 looks prime, because of no reason at all, and absolutely nothing looks like it should be divisible by 17, again, because raisins.

Knowing why it's true doesn't make it look right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But I can wrap my head around that 51 is divisible by seventeen because of 21 and seven plus something that deals with the remaining 30 somewhere.

I know that's not how it works, but as you say it fixes my vibes when I see the 21 hiding inside the 51.

I'll say this: the other thing that makes this one a hard pill to swallow is that 17 looks way too big, and my vibes fix doesn't address that, but hey.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If there’s a number that’s the most oddball in the multiplication table, it’s 7.

It’s a prime number that doesn’t share any common divisors with 10, and isn’t adjacent to a divisor of 10 either.

2 and 5 are common divisors of 10, so they’re piece of cake.

3 is so small and close to 2, so it’s not too difficult to get.

9 is one off from 10, so it has a very predictable pattern.

4, 6 and 8 are even numbers, so they share common divisors with 10.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

299,999 is divisible by 7 and 17.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

C’mon Chloe! This is 3rd grade math.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The information was there in front of Chloe and me this whole time, and still, we never realized

[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell me you're not a dart player without telling me you don't play darts.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly I generally assume that everyone that isn't a slightly portly northern English man carrying a pint does not play darts seriously

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gen X Californians for some reason

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›