this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
1262 points (98.0% liked)

Work Reform

10137 readers
51 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

That is…what a way to inspire mass exodus in the remaining employees.

Here, be honest. Thank you. You’re fired. This feels very Trump-y.

[–] [email protected] 194 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

Whenever you are having a bad day just remember you had like 1/4 chance of spawning in India

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol ppl do work surveys? Jesus fuck, why?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't be surprised to hear this shit was mandatory.

[–] [email protected] 148 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago

"Beatings didn't work. Let's try hunger and homelessness"

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Every company I've worked at sends these surveys out and says they are "anonymous". I never respond to them.

  1. If they are truly anonymous, why does my boss personally call me out to respond to them? I know it may track if you have submitted the survey. If it has that capability, then it can track you.

  2. I don't want a "moral boosting" pizza party. Give me more time off or more pay.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I respond to all of them with brutal honestly. My most recent one was along the lines of

"A major topic of the town hall meeting was the push to get [sales number] by the end of the year. We did the same thing last year and I got a 2% raise. What is my incentive to make you money if my raises don't even match inflation?"

Even if it's anonymous, my boss knows it's me. This way I can bring it up in my review as a callback as opposed to trying to awkwardly work it in to the conversation

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

And why is the url they send always "website.com/survey-name/[random hash]"? Why are there trackers on this totally anonymous, fo sho, survey link?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

"It's not me, it's you"

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This has got to be from The Onion... Right?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More like the onion banji

(Ba-dum tsh)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is wow, I mean we are used to a lot, but wow.

They also write "100% Purely Bhartiya Brand" on their (really terrible) page. I am not indian, so I might be wrong, but this raises some questionmarks.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

If anyone has questions about what bhartiya means, it means Indian.

So the whole phrase means 100% purely Indian company. Equivalent to the phrase 100% purely American company.

In both countries, this could indicate alignment with the ultra nationalist party in power who have been espousing a push to produce goods within the country instead of importing from china, or just a normal support local businesses thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 237 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The stressed employees were almost certainly the high performers lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And they just included them all in the 'to' instead of bcc. Very professional.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That email is company wide, not specific to those fired

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's normally standard to send mass emails using BCC to avoid someone using the Reply All button to spam up people's inboxes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Totally - just pointing out that implied in the first comment was those included in the email were the fired ones when that's not the case

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah you're right, I missed the "impacted employees will receive" line. Tired skimming fails again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Easy mistake to make - it wasn't exactly front and center

[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, but you always BCC large groups like that to prevent reply-all disasters.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was once on a massive reply-all chain. Most of the emails were "stop replying all!" But one made me chuckle. "I like these emails it makes me feel important."

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

My favorite was when someone from HR finally replied and asked everyone to stop replying to all or else. Then one guy replied “Ok” to all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I was once in a reply all email chain where one person got so irrate at everyone else that a subreddit was created just to post memes about this person. I wish I could remember the sub name, but it was years ago and the sub probably isnt there anymore anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

100% - it's obviously a company run by slack jawed morons but the original comment had assumed it was only those affected getting the email, which is a different context

[–] [email protected] 303 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Toxic positivity in action

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 148 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Well, that is going to backfire because they just made all new stress for the current employees

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, they did, but the remaining employees won't dare complain about it so management sees this as a twofer win.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›