this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
110 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
279 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Up until like a year or two ago, YouTube links always used to be pretty clean. The format was youtube .com/watch?v=[video_ID]. A year or two ago, they started adding a tracking suffix on, so it would be youtube .com/watch?v=[video_ID] &si=[tracking_ID].

Over the last day or so, I've noticed links with a different format, youtube .com/watch?v=[video_ID]&pp=[tracking_ID] - only the pp= string is much longer than the si= string. This can only be because they're including more information in it. What that information is is anyone's guess.

This is basically a PSA to watch YouTube links more carefully, as people are by and large complacent with them (moreso than other links) and never even realised the si= change, let alone this new pp= change.

It could also be that the change to pp= is meant to circumvent communities, like this one, which automatically filter out the si= suffix. They may have decided to address that, then took the opportunity to make their tracking more severe.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It encodes the contents of the search bar.

E.g. for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNQXAC9IVRw&pp=ygUTZmlyc3QgeW91dHViZSB2aWRlbw%3D%3D

ygUTZmlyc3QgeW91dHViZSB2aWRlbw== is first youtube video in base64, which is what I typed into the search bar to find that video.

Not sure if that's actually useful for tracking or if there's another technical reason for it, but at the very least it could accidentally expose your search terms to others if you end up sharing links like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

that's interesting. do you perhaps also know what the si param contains?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's how you get it. I just tried it and got the regular si link which doesn't seem to have valid b64 data.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since a long time, out of respect for others, I only share YT videos like this: youtube,com/embed/[video_ID]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

respect for others

But also yourself. Like this you won't get grouped by Google with other people online.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know, that is the idea

https://openuserjs.org/scripts/Kraust/Youtube_Embed_Redirect

Little script with few bytes, I installed it as extension. It redirect embedded when I click on a YT link or open a video in a new tab. It0s more confortable as edit the URL by hand, the script don't do other than this. Apart you can watch it in full tab size, better quality and without ads. You can search the Video also with Andi and watch it there embedded and sandboxed in the search result.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn’t their a Firefox plugin that did this? I recall a while ago to help do the same with Amazon but I never installed it and I don’t remember what it was called…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I think the extension you're talking about is ClearURL.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Firefox has "copy link without site tracking" built in now

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

Doesn't work for &pp= yet, though. At least, it doesn't on ESR (and, by extension, Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Thanks for shedding light on this. I've also noticed the same thing on Instagram links. They now have a "igsh=" added to track sharing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What about that youtu.be one

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So long as there's no extra suffix after, it shouldn't be so bad. So if you have youtu.be/?v=[video_ID] it's fine, but if there's a &si= or &pp= or &anything=, then that's most likely tracking and should be removed.

? is the start of the suffixes, & denotes a change in suffix. Every video has a v= suffix to denote the video itself, but everything else isn't needed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

? is the start of the suffixes, & denotes a change in suffix

Technically speaking they are query parameters not suffixes.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lmfao, this community has automatically removed the si= suffix in my second link. But it didn't remove the pp= suffix....

Edit: Fixed, finally. It kept trying to convert my links all over the place. They're not meant to be links, just a clear description of the syntax.