this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

United Kingdom

4076 readers
33 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Owning shit isn't working. Why is this controversial?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the right wing media wants it to be. The answer is simple.

Cool if owning property is work. Let's abolish capital gains tax and charge it as income.

Because at the end of it. That is what the telegraph etc is saying. They are trying to argue Starmer agreed to hold all taxes when the manifesto clearly stated working taxes.

Cool call their bluff all capital gains is now charged as income tax.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Well no other system would sell a waxing kit to a yeti.

So I spose its...... unique

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a landlord (I own two properties) and as someone who also works full time I agree with him.

It may take up some time but ultimately it's an investment.

Landlords like myself aren't (typically) struggling, so we should pay more tax, especially now as the country needs it. I am proud to say I don't tax dodge and pay what I owe. But unfortunately there are many loopholes that can be exploited to avoid paying tax. Just a few weeks ago someone was telling me how I should put my properties under a LTD company to avoid paying tax (I didn't and won't). I hope the Labour government does more to close these loopholes for tax dodgers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This man has never had renters

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

My last renter texted me and told me the toilet wouldn't flush. She said she "took it apart" but couldn't fix it so it needed to be snaked out. I go there and a neighbor told me she set a can of cat food on the tank for her kitten to eat and it knocked the can into the bowl. She tried to flush it down. Her boyfriend shows up and tells me the same story. She only took the tank off (nowhere near where a clog would be) and she replaced it without replacing the gasket so it had been leaking water. Once I knew what the problem was I fixed it in 30 minutes. Her keeping the truth from me made it take a lot longer and cost more. I charged her $300 less rent than the property next door in a trendy neighborhood because I didn't want to be "part of the problem ". Long story short, not everyone is cut out to be a home owner.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

because I didn’t want to be "part of the problem "

And yet, you're still a landlord.. 🤔

I guess the greed won over, eh?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Your claim to be a worker because you did half an hour's work in a month for a landlord's income that's so large you can afford to discount it by £300 a month isn't the winning argument you think it is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My toilet and drain is maintained well enough that it would flush some cat food if needed.

Thanks to my landlord that is Mountainbiking all day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

It's a good thing we've got people like you making that choice instead of leaving it to everyone to decide

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a moron, but fixing a toilet once doesn’t make it a job. It’s passive income like an investment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Own a house then get back to me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pay income tax rather than capital gains tax on your house.

Then get back to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I paid income taxes, property taxes and since I sold the house I will soon pay capital gains taxes

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I own a house. I work and I hire people if I can't fix something myself. So far I've only had to do that once in 4 years. Owning a house is not a job. Landlord literally has "LORD" in the name... kinda hard to defend, friend.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Pay income tax rather than capital gains tax on your house.

Then get back to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's the strangest argument I've heard in a while. Owning a house isn't a job but maintaining one is. Plumbing, electrical, carpentry, roofing, HVAC are all jobs and if you don't think so you must be one of these Republicans that think a person who gets their hands dirty doesn't deserve a living wage.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

A plumber or a sparky doesn't just maintain one house, and if they're just doing maintenance, probably work on hundreds of houses a year. Maintaining your own house takes a fraction of the time and effort of working a housing-related trade full time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Owning a house isn’t a job but maintaining one is.

I think you just agreed with each other a little bit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I own a house, got a plumber for replace a cistern was like 30 mins of work, and I did that whilst working!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your comment doesn't make sense and is confusing. Are you AI?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Illiterate and a landlord? That does check out, you pathetic excuse for a parasitic infection somehow confused for a human.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Care to explain to me how anyone replaces a cistern in 30 minutes? Either this guy got his terminology mixed up or they got ripped off

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How do you take longer? It's a ten minute job with a journeyman and apprentice helper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I challenge anyone to disconnect the water feed, remove the top part of the siphon, remove the likely rusted manky bolts holding the cistern, remove the bottom part of the siphon, clean the whole lot up where the foam ring has turned to mush, remove the old filler mechanism, replace it, plus the siphon, bolt the cistern back to the toilet, reconnect water supply, adjust fill height of both the siphon and the filler, then install the push button and test. Then clean up behind yourself

In ten minutes 😂

Bear in mind the guy you're speaking to is a yank and their plumbing makes the fucking Roman bathhouses look modern lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Could you imagine a world where the word rent never existed. I bet it would be awesome.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure you mean that you'd like a world with no landlords and not a world where short term housing solutions don't exist. No rent would imply the latter. Unless you know of a way to do it without paying rent?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Community housing that's fully tax funded. Common houses or public houses have been around for millenia, until the last couple hundred years really.

Oh and "the tragedy of the commons" is literally propaganda made up by a literal feudal lord.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How did that work when it came to deciding who gets the more desirable housing versus the less desirable ones? Or those who are not from the area and don't pay taxes to cover the housing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's work on getting people housed before faffing about with pointless nonsense like more or less desirable housing. When even the victorians has lower homelessness rates you don't get to worry about desirability.

Second point, who cares? If they're living there now they pay tax there now. It does not matter they didn't pay tax before they lived there, that's how all other services work. You don't pay for the roads in a town you just moved to until you're moved in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

It's not pointless. Depending on where you live, there's a good chance you do have an abundance of cheap housing available. They're just not in desirable locations, so many would opt to either pay extra for the privilege of living in more desirable homes or even living on the streets.

Regarding taxes, I'm talking about those who haven't previously paid taxes, are not currently paying taxes while living in the area, and have no plans to pay taxes after they leave the area.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

I'd rather the word homeless never existed

load more comments
view more: next ›