this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
492 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2195 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I was in favour of mummifying HRH so that her preserved corpse could continue to be our figurehead leader. Honestly, as stupid as it sounds, I don't think anyone can argue that it's more stupid than the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

SUBJECTS WILL ALWAYS SUPPORT OR PROTEST AGAINST THE RULER... It was, is and will be the norm for monarchy.

This ultra privileged section of society do nothing really nothing and just use tax payers money to showcase their immense wealth.

Let that indigenous LADY SENATOR go berserk against the RULER OF THE COMMONWEALTH who is much more energised and privileged to focus on courting with his newly „announced wife“ rather than providing advice to the problems normal people.

AT LEAST LEND AN EAR TO THE VOICE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

she was removed for speaking up against colonial criminals as an indigenous person. fucking boot lickers. probably literally too; wouldn't be surprised.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh boy, wait til you learn about the Commonwealth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

The Commonwealth isn't the countries with the British Monarch as head of state.

But yeah, the British Monarch is the head of state in Australia. Annoyingly

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Lidia Thorpe is not wrong when Briitish colonialism fucked the world. The British should be held accountable for that. However, this arguement can be made to absolve the Australian government of their fuckery with indigenous people.

Sure, Australia didn't become federate until the early 1900s. However, I would imagine sometime prior to that Australia was acting more or less as an independent country.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What do you mean by "The British should be held accountable"?

Who, exactly? And how, exactly?

The monarch, the government, the entire population?

Reparations? If you sell everything - crown estates, crown jewels, all the art, everything - are you going to deliver $7.28 to every single person in a former colony?

How about we look forwards, instead? There's little to be gained in trying to make current-day nations pay reparations for things that their ancestors did.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There’s little to be gained in trying to make current-day nations pay reparations for things that their ancestors did.

"We will not blame [King George] for the crimes of his ancestors if he relinquishes the royal rights of his ancestors; but as long as he claims their rights, by virtue of descent, then, by virtue of descent, he must shoulder the responsibility for their crimes.".
-James Connolly

How about we look forwards, instead?

How about we look at the present? Because colonialism isn't over. People are still suffering from it right now. The global south is still actively being colonized and exploited right now.

You can't drive a knife into someone's ribs then say "what's in the past is in the past, we need to look forward instead" when your hand is still holding the blade. How can you hope to start the process of healing if you haven't even taken the knife out all the way?

Now, I don't have all the answers for how that healing process is going to work for the world, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire dancing around in a golden hat and velvet robes with a title that says "God made my bloodline special so I can stab whoever I want" isn't a part of it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting take. Let's not hold anybody to account by that logic. So what if the car I drive is stolen, I didn't steal it. So what if the lady that I paid to have sex with was coerced, I didn't force her. So what if the wealth that I stole from others is used to persecute the rest of the world...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

So in your two hypothetical situation, what benefit does punishing you provide to any of the victims?

load more comments
view more: next ›