Networking

440 readers

1 users here now

This is a community dedicated to all types of computer networking (physical/virtual/cloud/etc.)

Computers use common communication protocols over digital interconnections to communicate with each other. These interconnections are made up of telecommunication network technologies based on physically wired, optical, and wireless radio-frequency methods that may be arranged in a variety of network topologies.

Helpful Links:

Computer Network (Wikipedia)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to networking
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Try to keep discussions on topic
No spam of tools/companies/advertisements.
It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Metering bandwidth on a per-app/process basis, even website-specific (slrpnk.net)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/4975009

Are there any Debian apps that will track bandwidth consumption on a per-app basis, and ideally website-specific when a browser with sandboxing has multiple tabs?

These tools are vaguely described as being able to monitor network traffic:

iftop, nload, nethogs, vnstat, bmon, iperf, netperf, iptraf, cbm, zabbix, nagios, cacti, darkstat, sarg, monitorx, etherape

I’ve tried iftop, nload, vnstat, & bmon. Some of those are just showing realtime stats (bytes per second) and some are per net interface, not per app. I need to know the total bandwidth used on a per-process basis so if a website is streaming or buffering something heavy like video I can react. Since browsers tend to have sandboxing, i think there is a separate process per website. So if a website is a pig I need stats on it.

Ultimately I’m on a limited connection and it’s a mystery what is hogging my bandwidth allowance. I prefer light non-graphical apps but I guess I can’t be too fussy at this point.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here