Those signs won't stop Americans because we can't read.
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
2206 readers
19 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I saw this type of labeling all over Chile and Argentina a few months ago. It was similar to the Prop 65 warnings in California: too many warnings waters down the message.
I hope they take an approach that allows normal, non-ultraprocessed food to go without the label.
Meh. Informational labelling is only ever going to be supplanting marketing noise on a product anyway.
Any actual fact printed on the packaging is better than "100% natural ingredients*", "the healthy choice**", "99% fat free***", and non-representative imagery****
* The 17% puréed orphans is entirely natural.
** when consumed at the recommended serving size once a month.
*** but 25% sugar
**** serving suggestion