this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
680 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2344 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
680
A man opened an emergency exit and walked on a plane's wing. Passengers are supporting his action (apnews.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At first it sounds like a typical case of bad behavior aboard airplanes.

The Mexico City International Airport acknowledged in a statement Friday that a man had opened an emergency exit and walked out on a wing of a plane that was parked and waiting for takeoff Thursday.

The airport said the man had been turned over to police.

But dozens of fellow passengers signed a written copy of a statement saying the airline made them wait for four hours without ventilation or water while the flight was delayed. According to photos of the statement posted online, fellow passengers said he acted “to protect everyone, with the support of everyone.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 149 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I'll never ever understand why they do not simply let the passengers deboard the aircraft, nor why consumers put up with this kind of shoddy treatment. The terminal is right there. Let the people wait out whatever bad weather or maintenance issue the airline is having in the comfort of the terminal.

To demand anything less is simply a failure in logistics. The customer should never have to sit on a plane for any longer than an hour without it taking off once boarding is complete and the doors are sealed.

I always told myself I'd be the guy to do this if I ever found myself in a similar situation. To be honest, I'm not sure I could go for nearly 5 hours without the plane taxiing. 3 hours would probably be my limit before I decided it would be preferable to spend my time in a jail cell rather than an airplane.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

If the passengers disembark the airlines have to pay more money to the airport authority so they keep everyone on board to save money. They only car about how much money they can extract from passengers not their comfort.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

The worst is when you fall asleep on the plane for ages, wake up in your seat, and they still haven't taken off.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What I’m wondering is what they’d do if you told the flight attendant you’re having chest pains and a shooting pain in your left arm. They’re not going to want to hold a person on board who may require emergency medical treatment. You might not make it back on board that particular flight, but with that kind of delay I’d probably just rather rebook anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Based on personal experience, they take you off the plane to a medical team who will evaluate you, run an EKG for example. They can refuse to let you board another flight depending on their evaluation.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they'd take the plane straight back to a gate and pass you off to EMS. And then leave without you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

If they have a six hour delay, I probably have some padding in that timeline. They’d hook me up and say “It’s just a panic attack, here’s some O2” and send me on my way. Then I’m either getting back on the plane, rescheduling with the ticket desk, or hitting up a bar and heading home until tomorrow.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

As a fat man nearing middle age I think I just found my superhero origin story.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Talking completely out of my rear end here but whenever something like that happens it is usually a liability issue. Neither the airline - let alone the crew want passengers anywhere outside their plane after boarding. There's a billion things that could go wrong if they left the plane. The crew could have likely fixed the issue with free drinks or something like that but then again, liability...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Deboarding happens all the time. Passengers board, malfunction detected, everyone is taken off the plane. There is absolutely no liability to deboarding.

The only issue was some manager's bonus was at risk if they didn't have 100% departures.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It seems a bit odd to me that the crew would stick up for some manager this much. Especially since the plane did not depart in time either way. I'm leaning towards something going wrong with the communication between the airport and crew, resulting in them having no permission to deboard the plane but your guess is as good as mine.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The crew gets paid hourly with the clock starting only after the doors close. They don't get paid for all the time waiting for boarding/deboarding or other delays when they aren't on the plane with the doors closed. It doesn't matter to them whether they are in the air or not. Tarmac delays increase crew pay because longer turn around means more hours paid.

https://www.flyingmag.com/guides/flight-attendants-pay-per-hour/#:~:text=Flight%20attendants%20are%20only%20paid,the%20cabin%20door%20is%20closed.

In the US, after many high profile incidents, DOT rules require that the plane offers deboarding after 3 hours. But this wasn't the US so abusing the passengers for profit is legal.

https://www.cntraveler.com/story/tarmac-delay-rules

There was no miscommunication. It was profit motivated.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I could see the crew having a profit incentive if what you said is true but that's a different argument

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I already linked proof that crew are paid starting when the door closes? It was in the news during the last airline strike.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but again that's not what you said before. Before that it was le evil manager guy not risking his booonus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Profit margins on flights average around 9%. A plane that deboards is a loss of tens of thousands of dollars. Executives get bonuses based on the airline's profitability.

https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2885&context=etd

You think an airline is pissing off customers with long delays for the lolz? Why would they do that if they could save money by deboarding?

The second part was you argued as to why the crew would accept it. I answered that with sources explaining that the crew is incentivized to wait too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Very interesting, I didn't expect their margins to be this low. 9% is nothing for the capital investment you have to put up to get and run an airline, no wonder so many of them are going broke.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's more work for them and I guess more work costs them more money?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I’m not sure why deplaning passengers would cost more money. The flight crew and terminal operators are still working throughout the period. The one thing I can see oosssibly causing an issue is going back to the terminal and u loading the luggage, but it literally happens every day. I can’t see it taking more than about 30 minutes based on my experiences.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I took a flight from Miami to LA. A bachelorette in the back of the plane had a panic attack (alcohol may or may not have been involved) and we had to stop in Austin to drop her off. I can’t imagine what it cost to do that or what consequence she may have suffered. Traveling is stressful for everyone but starting out with a four hour unexplained wait had to be unbearable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

If you're parked at the gate you incur gate fees.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The staff that was boarding the plane may be working on boarding other planes now. The gate may no longer be available and taking one may require coordination with another plane and that could also cause delays to the other plane. The ground staff needed to get the plane to the gate would be needed again. There's plenty of staff that's not in the plane that's needed that are probably busy working on other planes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Let them out in a designated area next to the plane, I've been deboarded outside the terminal before, just walked down steps right onto the tarmac.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 9 months ago (1 children)

dozens of fellow passengers signed a written copy of a statement saying the airline made them wait for four hours without ventilation or water while the flight was delayed. According to photos of the statement posted online, fellow passengers said he acted “to protect everyone, with the support of everyone.”

“The delay and lack of air created conditions that endangered the health of the passengers. He saved our lives,”

wow airlines can just do whatever and if you don't like it the cops will beat the shit out of you

Here is a list of people who were sold seats on an airplane, then threatened with violence and arrest when it turned out the airline didn't have the seats to sell. One woman tried to use a seat she had purchased for her 2 year old instead of her teenage son for whom it was originally purchased. She was told that if she didn't give up the seat that they would take custody of her kid from her. Another woman bought a seat for her child, and then the airline just sold the seat out from under her to a standby passenger and told her "too bad". She said she was afraid to speak up because the last time she had seen other passengers who insisted on actually getting what they paid for beaten up and dragged away by police. Don't worry though, instead of giving her the seat she purchased they gave her a lei.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago

Welcome to the wonderful world of post-9/11 authoritarianism. Remember, it's all to protect you from terrorists so they're justified in doing anything they want to you

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

Shit headline for the actual story.

load more comments
view more: next ›