this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
63 points (98.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54746 readers
222 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

For me this falls in the category of "sit back and eat popcorn". Both sides are arseholes I don't mind which loses, in fact it's a shame they all can't lose

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I get that Google sucks and should be taken down a few pegs, but this is just dumb.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

*taken down.

There, ftfy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Invalid grammar in the headline. "It" is Google not the lawsuit as regular grammar rules would dictate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it then still be weird, so "the lawsuit benefits from piracy"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. Although that is valid and could be an actual thing. I don't know but I think US law "entitles" copyright holders to the value of pirated things and then some. Which technically profits from piracy.