this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17602 readers
545 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean like why? Just open and update when I'm done that's what every other browser does. Stop making me wait to use the Internet firefox!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I see it like thank you that i don't have to go to Mozilla website and download the installer. So much time saved, and it only takes like 5 second without manually doing anything. On Linux i saw please restart Firefox tab and clicked it. No problem. I got the update fast.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Applications updating themselves... must be a Windows thing. Didn't they want to copy package management from Linux? Maybe AI can help.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

My issue with FF's auto update is that the behavior is how painfully the auto-update works with multiple profiles.

I'll have one window (well three) open for some (measurable in days) time.

  1. FF updates silently, I haven't restarted my browser so I haven't noticed.
  2. I go to open a session in the second (or third profiles)
  3. FF decides now is a great time to apply the update, after all it just opened right?
  4. All the existing open browsing sessions in the other profiles get bricked. The tabs just stop responding, no browsing works, just dead in the water.

I have to shut it (all?) down to get it working again.

I don't know how Chrome handles this so I cannot compare. TBH still worth using FF over that adware!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Went not just disable automatic updates? Update when you have time for it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I don't think I've ever noticed Firefox updating. The only sign I get that it updates is that when it does a special tab opens telling me about the new features.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Ubuntu has an even better approach. It updates silently while you are using it. Then your tab crashes. And when you retry it tells you to restart firefox. Truly genius *cheffs kiss

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

chef's* kiss

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

As an Arch user. I wanted to use Arch at work too. Well, they want me to use Kubuntu (or any other prefered Ubuntu, but I like KDE so I do what every other dev uses)... except for Home Office ofc. Arch.

Still. I hate this stupid update thing. Suddenly I get 20 notifications of KDE system wanting a reboot because of updates and Firefox doing exactly this.

The worst. When I open a new tab by middleclicking a link, the tab crashes. I restart Firefox and the new Tab is gone forever. Sometimes its easy to get what I saw but not always.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

How else would you know it was doing anything?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Just use a a package manager

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The better approach would be to prepare the update in the background and swap out the version on the next start

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Isn't that what it does? That's how it works on macOS, and I get prompted to restart on Linux when I install updates in the background.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah and it only takes seconds on a decent PC.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm on Windows and I don't recall the last time I was inconvenienced by a Firefox update. Like... I can't even remember what it actually does. OP must be running it on a potato or something.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I think they mean when you go to open Firefox (when it updates) it immediately closes and reopens the first time? At least mine does that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought it did too, but this post says it's different? Maybe they're wrong. I haven't double checked.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think Firefox works like Chrome does here. Both give me a little notice in the menu that a new version is ready, and Chrome is a little more annoying about it (turns yellow, then red). I need both for work, and I much prefer how Firefox does it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

What I noticed – I turned on my 💻, opened Firefox then Firefox was updating. It was fast. So it hasn't been annoying so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

huh? at least on windows, firefox just uses its background maintenance service to take care of updates. no admin needed. I don't even notice when it happens, except for the occasional "what's new" page that opens along with firefox.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

There is a comment below where someone posted a picture of the settings. Clearly it is insanely easy to make Firefox update in whatever way you want: automatic, manually, automatically in the background.

OP completely ignored facts and only wants their moment to stand on a soap box with their stupid and lazy complaint.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I imagine for security best practices, software prefers update on open (if not update on checking a central update server regularly like yum -whatever update), but for user convenience this would be better for so many things.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I disagree. Software not terminating immediately is grounds for uninstallation. It should update silently while it runs.

load more comments
view more: next ›