71
Campaign fact check: Here’s how Kamala Harris really prosecuted marijuana cases (2019)
(www.mercurynews.com)
Wow, fashion has sure changed.
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
71 points (85.1% liked)
politics
18883 readers
3607 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"My X-MEN, to me!"
So she did her job. What's the problem?
She did fine... But the way you phrase it sounds a lot like the Nuremberg defense.
No, I phrased it very simply. You're describing what she did as a crime against humanity? WTF.
there's been a misunderstanding and now we're enemies!
“Kamala Harris and I disagreed on a lot of criminal justice issues, but I have to admit, she was probably the most progressive prosecutor in the state at the time when it came to marijuana,”
;tldr is she did her job well as PA and litigated marijuana charges without seeking jail time solely for that crime. Supported medical marijuana at the time, and after it is all said in done also supports legalization nowadays.
👍
Hell yeah
Not about the substance of the article, but something that the right can't comprehend is that people can grow and change their opinions. And can advocate for different policies than they supported or acted on in the past. It's okay to have been wrong. It's okay to have made mistakes. It's okay to grow and change. Maybe if they realized that they would be happier people.
They seem to think that everyone changes their opinion the way J.D. Vance does: by just becoming a serial liar.
Her prosecutors appear to have convicted people on marijuana charges at a higher rate than under her predecessor, based on data about marijuana arrests in the city.
But former lawyers in Harris’ office and defense attorneys who worked on drug cases say most defendants arrested for low-level pot possession were never locked up. And only a few dozen people were sent to state prison for marijuana convictions under Harris’ tenure.
While there were more marijuana convictions during Hallinan’s tenure, there were also a lot more arrests. San Francisco arrest data compiled by the Attorney General’s office suggests that 24 percent of marijuana arrests led to marijuana convictions under Harris, compared with 18 percent of arrests under Hallinan.
Conviction rate aside, only 45 people were sentenced to state prison for marijuana convictions during Harris’ seven years in office, compared with 135 people during Hallinan’s eight years
“Our policy was that no one with a marijuana conviction for mere possession could do any (jail time) at all,” said Paul Henderson, who led narcotics prosecutions for several years under Harris.
In other words, she prosecuted people for weed but sought lesser sentences. Laws after she left office lead to distorted interpretations of what happened after she left.
Paywall
Honest, I hope she prosecuted them all properly. It's not a DA's job to just let people off the hook when they legit break the law. If you want to change the law, you should probably become a Senator or something.
Regardless, it seems like she went fairly light on them for a prosecutor in the 00s. Since then we've had more progressive prosecutors but that wasn't really a thing at that time.
I get what you're saying, and I'll be voting for the democrat nominee regardless. However, a large part of a DA's responsibility is to exercise discretion in which cases to prosecute and which sentences to recommend. From the article:
Harris had wide latitude to decide which marijuana cases to prosecute and what sentences to seek
Certainly, and I would hope she was reasonable about it, particularly when it came to sentencing for people like first time offenders. Which cases to prosecute should just be the ones with strong evidence of guilt though. Not something like "I think marijuana laws are wrong so I won't prosecute those."
There are still laws against sodomy in many states. Those laws are backwards and antiquated, but they are still laws. I would expect every DA in the country to throw out a sodomy case involving two or more consenting adults not only because it's a stupid law but because spending tax-payer money on such a case does nothing to protect the public good.
Generally I agree, though it depends a little bit. If the local populace strongly feels sodomy should be illegal, then they have the right to have that law. The DA should then enforce it.
Fair point though.
I couldn't disagree more with that. That's the kind of thinking that results in the perpetuation of all kinds of racist and bigoted laws that strip people of their personal freedoms.
I agree, it is. I believe that our rights come from the people, though, and it is ultimately people that are responsible for choosing and upholding them. This is why we can amend our constitution.
Paywalled
https://12ft.io/https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/09/11/kamala-harris-prosecuting-marijuana-cases/
Just edited the post to add. Weird formatting but just scroll past the photos