this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
85 points (82.0% liked)

Firefox

17899 readers
50 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Firefox user and evangelist of over a decade. Fuck Firefox for this. Condescending snake oil bullshit is what this is. There's many ways that Firefox is objectively worse that chrome. It's supported fewer places, it's slower, whatever. Firefox is only good because they're not the web browser with a monopoly and they're a non-profit so they care about things like privacy. But for some reason, they seem determined to destroy all the goodwill that has brought them over time and push users wanting those things away. That's like Firefox's entire user base. I can use some other minority market share browser. Bye Felicia

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Opt-in is only meaningful if users can make an informed decision. I think explaining a system like PPA would be a difficult task. And most users complain a lot about these types of interruption.

In my opinion an easily discoverable opt-out option + blog posts and such were the right decision.

So you see, because the users can't meaningfully give informed consent, their consent is therefore uh... [checks notes] not necessary.

Bullshit. Everyone knows that it's because if you actually ask someone "do you want to be creepy tracked, less-creepy tracked, or not tracked?" they'll pick "not" every time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

i think the goal is to come up with a 'better' solution than what google has already rolled-out to the majority of web users.. but with firefox's too-low adoption rate, it won't do anything significant.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All of the Firefox forks are Firefox with a user.js added to it. So just use Firefox with a user.js. Here's three user.js'.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As someone who uses ff with a user script I can totally see why someone would want the convenience of this built in out of the box. We can have both. And a person can use both.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The biggest problem I have is they don't link their user.js. So you can see what they're doing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

Wdym? It's open source.

You know user.js is just Firefox about:config flags built into Firefox from the tor upscale project...you can literally just do about:config and read the setup. Or read the source.

Heres the repo: https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings

Heres their default flags https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings/src/branch/master/librewolf.cfg

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Great article, Makes a lot of the arguments I made against advertiser and mozilla apologists in the previous threads better than I could have.

I think

PPA is an additional privacy attack surface that has no value for end users whatsoever [...]

and

If they truly believed this was the one path away from the constant data theft perpetuated by the advertising industry, they would've announced this loudly and proudly. They could've given the privacy and general Firefox communities ample time to scrutinize the protocol beforehand.

sums it up pretty well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

scrutinize the protocol beforehand.

Sorry but that buys into the data miners' self serving myths. It implies the protocol is ok unless some failure makes it leak more information than was intended. In fact it's invasive even if it works exactly as hoped. "Tracking" is a misnomer too. It's hostile surveillance even if it's at population level. (Any nonconsensual surveillance that produces info to be used by people you don't like is hostile by definition. And it's near guaranteed that some of the buyers-advertisers, political campaigns and funders, govt agencies, whatever-will be people you don't like). So shut it down.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago

They could've given the privacy and general Firefox communities ample time to scrutinize the protocol beforehand.

Like when they announced they were working on it in 2022: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/privacy-preserving-attribution-for-advertising/