Thanks for the update! But I noticed an issue: it seems you haven't commented on defederating from Threads? Please let us know if you are so we can respond accordingly.
Lemmy.World Announcements
This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.
Follow us for server news 🐘
Outages 🔥
https://status.lemmy.world/
For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.
Support e-mail
Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.
Report contact
- DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
- Email [email protected] (PGP Supported)
Donations 💗
If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.
If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us
Join the team
The same admins run a Mastodon instance. They are taking a “wait and see” approach on Mastodon. Their lack of statement on their Lemmy instance leads me to believe they will be taking the same approach.
This doesn’t work for me - I joined Lemmy to be as far from big tech as possible. Time to exercise the power of the fediverse and move to an instance that admins in a way I prefer!
Yup, hence why I'm on lemm.ee. Originally made an instance to cover when .world was being slow but I think this will be my main now. They haven't finalized the vote but it seems to be going the defed route.
Still hugely supportive of the .world admins though. They've done a ton of work to keep .world running and a ton of digging that will help lemmy overall. I just don't agree with federating with big social media.
Where can I learn about transferring my community to another instance? Lemmy.worlds silence about threads means he has no intent to defederate so I need to move over to lemmy.ml.
Or is this not possible? Do I just need to walk away from my community because @ruud doesn’t care about the issue?
If that’s the case, how do I add a mod that doesn’t care about meta expressly stating they are going to add features to ActivityPub protocol (step two of EEE)? I don’t want to keep coming back here if it is federated with threads but I don’t need to leave whoever is staying here high and dry.
Awesome, now block threads.net from this instance. Lemmy.ml already did it.
Hi! I noticed an issue with the headers sent by Lemmy.world.
Headers sent from and to this website's official UI look like this:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 23:35:17 GMT
content-type: application/json
vary: accept-encoding, Origin, Access-Control-Request-Method, Access-Control-Request-Headers
content-encoding: gzip
access-control-allow-origin: *
access-control-allow-methods: GET, POST, PUT, OPTIONS
access-control-allow-headers: DNT,User-Agent,X-Requested-With,If-Modified-Since,Cache-Control,Content-Type,Range
access-control-expose-headers: content-encoding, content-type, vary, Content-Length,Content-Range
X-Firefox-Spdy: h2
Which is fine. However, headers received by custom clients look like this:
HTTP/2 200 OK
server: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
date: Fri, 07 Jul 2023 23:33:50 GMT
content-type: application/json
vary: accept-encoding, Origin, Access-Control-Request-Method, Access-Control-Request-Headers
content-encoding: gzip
access-control-allow-origin: https://natoboram.github.io
access-control-expose-headers: content-encoding, access-control-allow-origin, content-type, vary
access-control-allow-origin: *
access-control-allow-methods: GET, POST, PUT, OPTIONS
access-control-allow-headers: DNT,User-Agent,X-Requested-With,If-Modified-Since,Cache-Control,Content-Type,Range
access-control-expose-headers: Content-Length,Content-Range
X-Firefox-Spdy: h2
There's two access-control-allow-origin
! This still breaks web clients.
My favourite thing except the emoji is the new theme
That is the ugliest thing I have ever seen. What the fuck.